Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.

Plus it turned into specific to me how the some other elements on the effort really work in conjunction for a wide effect

And then he essentially told you… you will find a good billion members of China to pass through. The west might have been overfishing the fresh seas for a long period. We will get the change. And i also leftover impression that i had extremely mishandled the brand new meeting. Right here, I got an email that was we possess a whole lot more eating out of a rich ocean. I had entirely didn’t create him keep in mind that lead to the guy read myself supplying the version of antique maintenance content that’s an essential one to but it is just no more than biodiversity safeguards.

You to made me read, really, hold off a moment, we could size what we are doing when you look at the a clinical metric which is the eating property value a great reconstructed ocean, the food financing from rebuilt ocean. Exactly how many edibles you are going to i offer regarding an effective rebuilt water? We called Bloomberg back up and i said, wait one minute, i’ve a separate tip. And let’s mention this food, the food metric.

Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I kissbrides.com anvГ¤nda en webblГ¤nk understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.

Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.

Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?

Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.

Wu

And therefore cooperating with, you are aware, our people here we have been now event landings investigation within the an enthusiastic certified and you can reliable means and you can reporting that right up. And they’re today meeting analysis into the about 40% of total fishery hook.

Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .